Background:

The petitioner seeks employment as a postdoctoral fellow at the University of Chicago. The petitioner asserts that an exemption from the requirement of a job offer, and thus of a labor certification, is in the national interest of the United States. The director found that the petitioner qualifies for classification as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree but that the petitioner had not established that an exemption from the requirement of a job offer would be in the national interest of the United States.

USCIS Decision & Reasons of Denial:

The director denied the petition on December 27, 2005, stating that the
petitioner’s response to the RFE failed to establish his eligibility for the
national interest waiver. As we have noted, however, the RFE did not give the
petitioner the opportunity to address the requirements set forth in Matter of New
York State Dept. of Transportation because the specific evidence requested in that
notice had nothing to do with the precedent decision. The director stated that
“[c]ounsel and the petitioner may have found the Service’s evidence request to be
overly burdensome,” and that “[i]t may also appear that the Service’s evidentiary
request inappropriately suggested the submission of documentation to demonstrate
the petitioner’s qualification for a range of immigrant classifications.”The
director, however, did not link these assertions to any substantive discussion of
the RFE itself.

AAO Decision:

The initial submission includes documentation showing that ten of the petitioner’s papers have been cited an aggregate total of 33 times. Only three of the ten papers have been cited more than twice, and only one (with 15 citations) has been cited more than five times. The petitioner lists the citing articles for four of these ten papers. The list accounts for 25 of the petitioner’s 33 citations. Thirteen of these 25 citations are self-citations by the petitioner and/or his collaborators, including nine of the 15 citations of the petitioner’s most-cited paper. Thus, the petitioner’s initial submission documents no more than 20 independent citations of his work, spread over ten papers for an average of, at most, two independent citation per article.

The initial submission documented, at best, a marginal rate of citation of the petitioner’s published work. The number of citations has increased over time, however, and there now exist several dozen more citations of the articles that the petitioner had published before the filing date. This objective evidence corroborates and is consistent with the independent witness letters submitted on appeal.

from Chen Immigration Law Associates

 

North America Immigration Law Group (Chen Immigration Law Associates) is a U.S. immigration law firm dedicated to representing corporations, research institutions, and individuals from all 50 U.S. states regarding I-140 immigration petitions. We specialize in employment-based immigration petition and have a proven record of high success rate for the categories of: EB2-NIW (National Interest Waiver), EB1-A (Alien of Extraordinary Ability), EB1-B (Outstanding Researcher/Professor) and O-1 (Alien of Extraordinary Ability).

Our Ten Thousand I-140 Approvals Provide Unprecedented Insight into the USCIS Adjudication Trend

With more than 16,000 EB-1A, EB-1B, EB-2 NIW and O-1 cases approved, we have first hand information on the manner in which the USCIS adjudicate I-140 cases. As the USCIS has constantly changed its adjudication standards for the EB-1A, EB-1B and EB-2 NIW categories, our firm's huge database of successful cases gives you unprecedented insight to USCIS adjudication trends. We carefully analyze the data for all of our cases and apply the results of our analyses toward giving our clients up-to-date advice and adapting our strategies such that we remain on par with the ever-shifting landscape of immigration law in the U.S. With us, you will always have access to important updates, strategies, and information so that you can make the most informed decisions about your case.

We Have Helped Hundreds and Thousands of Clients with Credentials and Backgrounds Similar to Yours

With our exceedingly large number of successful petitions, no matter what credentials you have, no matter your background and field of expertise, no matter your visa status or nationality, chances are we have helped hundreds or even thousands of clients just like you. Our clients are usually impressed with how well we understand their research and work. Our insight and understanding stems from the fact that we have handled many cases with elements similar to yours already, and this helps us devise the best strategies for each individual petition.

Vast Majority of Clients Came to Us Because of Referrals

For years, our firm has attracted new clients based solely on word of mouth, recommendations, and the positive collaboration experiences shared with them by their friends and family. We take pride in our reputation and work hard to ensure that we provide a green card application experience that our clients are happy to share with their friends and colleagues. That is how our approved cases grew from 600 in 2013 to over 3,500 in 2019.

---

To see more clients’ testimonials and approvals, please refer to:

Client's Testimonials

Approval Notices

To Learn More About Your Options CLICK HERE

---

Copyright © North America Immigration Law Group – WeGreened.com, All Rights Reserved.