Background:

The petitioner seeks classification pursuant to section 203(b)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. s 1153(b)(2), as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree. At the time she filed the petition on March 30, 2007, the petitioner was a doctoral student and graduate research assistant at the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston. The petitioner received her Ph.D. on August 15, 2007, and subsequently undertook postdoctoral training at the same institution. The petitioner asserts that an exemption from the requirement of a job offer, and thus of a labor certification,
is in the national interest of the United States.

USCIS Decision:

Denied the Employment-Based immigrant visa petition, NIW – Advanced Degree Professional. The director acknowledged the intrinsic merit and national scope of the petitioner’s occupation, but found that the petitioner had failed to establish the extent of her impact in her field. The director noted that the witnesses who provided letters “do not. . . provide any examples of specific resources that they have adopted or expressed interest in adopting” from the petitioner’s work. The director also found the petitioner’s documented citation history to be minimal. The director concluded that the record shows that the petitioner has “potential to influence the field,” but not that she has yet realized that potential.

USCIS’ Reasons of Denial:

The director found that the petitioner qualifies for classification as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree but that the petitioner had not established that an exemption from the requirement of a job offer would be in the national interest of the United States.

AAO Decision:

Even though the evidence indicates that over 1,200 of the 2,287 “Total Accesses” were repeat visits from the same IP address and the figure of 2,287 “Total Accesses” is, therefore, significantly inflated. The available evidence, in this instance, includes reliable documentation showing significant citation of the petitioner’s published work in major journals. Available citation evidence suggests that the petitioner’s work is growing in influence. The empirical citation evidence mutually reinforces the letters from independent witnesses, who have credibly and consistently explained why the petitioner’s findings are of particular significance in the ongoing efforts to fight lymphoma. The record is not without flaws, but as a whole, the body of evidence supports the assertion that the petitioner has already had a disproportionate influence in her field that is likely to continue to expand.

 from Chen Immigration Law Associates

North America Immigration Law Group (Chen Immigration Law Associates) is a U.S. immigration law firm dedicated to representing corporations, research institutions, and individuals from all 50 U.S. states regarding I-140 immigration petitions. We specialize in employment-based immigration petition and have a proven record of high success rate for the categories of: EB2-NIW (National Interest Waiver), EB1-A (Alien of Extraordinary Ability), EB1-B (Outstanding Researcher/Professor) and O-1 (Alien of Extraordinary Ability).

Our Ten Thousand I-140 Approvals Provide Unprecedented Insight into the USCIS Adjudication Trend

With more than 16,000 EB-1A, EB-1B, EB-2 NIW and O-1 cases approved, we have first hand information on the manner in which the USCIS adjudicate I-140 cases. As the USCIS has constantly changed its adjudication standards for the EB-1A, EB-1B and EB-2 NIW categories, our firm's huge database of successful cases gives you unprecedented insight to USCIS adjudication trends. We carefully analyze the data for all of our cases and apply the results of our analyses toward giving our clients up-to-date advice and adapting our strategies such that we remain on par with the ever-shifting landscape of immigration law in the U.S. With us, you will always have access to important updates, strategies, and information so that you can make the most informed decisions about your case.

We Have Helped Hundreds and Thousands of Clients with Credentials and Backgrounds Similar to Yours

With our exceedingly large number of successful petitions, no matter what credentials you have, no matter your background and field of expertise, no matter your visa status or nationality, chances are we have helped hundreds or even thousands of clients just like you. Our clients are usually impressed with how well we understand their research and work. Our insight and understanding stems from the fact that we have handled many cases with elements similar to yours already, and this helps us devise the best strategies for each individual petition.

Vast Majority of Clients Came to Us Because of Referrals

For years, our firm has attracted new clients based solely on word of mouth, recommendations, and the positive collaboration experiences shared with them by their friends and family. We take pride in our reputation and work hard to ensure that we provide a green card application experience that our clients are happy to share with their friends and colleagues. That is how our approved cases grew from 600 in 2013 to over 3,500 in 2019.

---

To see more clients’ testimonials and approvals, please refer to:

Client's Testimonials

Approval Notices

To Learn More About Your Options CLICK HERE

---

Copyright © North America Immigration Law Group – WeGreened.com, All Rights Reserved.