Making the Impossible Possible and Simple:  Approval after Denials & RFEs  (part II)

Victoria Chen, J.D., Esq.

CASE TWO – SAP MANAGEMENT & CONSULTING (EB-1A & EB-2 NIW)

Similar to case one, case two also concerned a foreign professional who decided to retain the services of Chen Immigration Law Associates following his receipt of RFEs for both his EB-1 and EB-2 cases and understandable dissatisfaction with the original attorney on record.  Additionally, since this client was also from India, and intended to travel internationally and nationally within the United States due to business necessities, it was likewise vital that he receive a first-preference visa approval (EB-1), rather than a national interest waiver under the second-preference category (EB-2).  However, in contrast to case one, this case deals with a SAP business professional in the field of supplier relations management and business process consulting. And while the client did not receive multiple denials prior to filing with us, he was under several constraints considering the international nature of his business endeavors and temporal employer relations at the time of filing.  Therefore, despite the unavailability of EB-2 National Interest Waiver (NIW) visas for foreign nationals from India, we decided it would be in the best interest of the client to respond to both of the RFEs on record with the USCIS.

 

After performing a comprehensive review of the client’s qualifications, the original petition cover letters, and the RFE letters received, it became evident that client’s qualifications and overall case were grossly understated and inappropriately emphasized under both self-petitioning categories.  To our dismay, we discovered that the client was the one responsible for compiling an “extended resume” and exhaustive summaries (over 60 pages in length) of his qualifications and pertinent contributions to the field, which was eventually and actually submitted to the USCIS along with a condensed version of such in the form of a petition “cover letter” compiled by the original attorney on file.  In this manner, the bulk of the work was left to the client, charging him with the duty to investigate and describe those qualifications and contributions which he felt conducive to Green Card petition approval.  With no offense or degradation to the knowledge or intelligence of our client or any others charged with similar duties throughout their applicative involvement in the Green Card process, it is easy to see where this case, along with others similar in nature, can quickly begin take inefficient and unproductive pathways in case preparation procedures.

 

Therein, similar to the expertise of our client (business process consulting), we sought to remedy and redefine the internal processes by which the case could become profitable and successful, resulting in a transformed and substantially bolstered end product.  Leaving the client to focus on his professional endeavors, we were able to reinvestigate the client’s qualifications, clarify the client’s specific field of endeavor, present the highlights of his background and achievements, and claim several regulatory criterion with evidence that had not been noted in the RFE and/or cover letter submitted by the original attorney.  For example, the RFE letter did not even acknowledge the petitioner’s Senior-level membership in IEEE, nor did it acknowledge the qualification or significance of a specific and important contribution the petitioner made through the review of an industry manual.

 

Accompanying these enriched elucidations with the acquisition of letters from new independent expert witnesses, we provided the USCIS with substantiating evidence to demonstrate the immense influence of the client’s business achievements throughout his specialized practice both internationally and nationally.  Although the client had notable witness letters on file, our strategic selection of new references to provide improved testimonials and explanations of the client’s contributions in an overarching international context dramatically outweighed those previously submitted to the USCIS by way of focusing on the most important qualifications and realigning these emphases with the client-tailored strategy for case approval.

 

Herewith, the USCIS does not accept the ‘excuse’ of intimately-held knowledge of contributions for business professionals, but rather extends the reasonable admission that intellectual property (IP) considerations are a common practice in business-based self-petitioner proceedings.  Therefore, by highlighting and detailing the contributions of the petitioner to the best of our ability, rather than merely hiding behind the shield of IP law in business, we successfully advised the USCIS to approve the petition via providing pertinent and underscored descriptions surrounding the highlights of the petitioner’s qualifications and contributions in the field to international corporate entities without overstepping the bounds of professional courtesy and closely-held trade secrets.  Respecting our redefined and unambiguous presentation of the facts and details of the case, the USCIS approved the client’s petition under both categories after just two months of receiving our response to the RFEs.

 

 

Relying on our inundated principles of advisory-based petition consul, adherence to the accurate portrayal of factual and statutory comparisons, and dedication to in-depth surveyances of clientele qualifications, we at Chen Immigration Law Associates seek to provide unwavering guidance and support in Green Card proceedings, recognizing that service, above all, trumps authority.  In attribution to the success of our principled-approach, and in provision of the ultimate reward of our work, the client in the aforementioned proceedings remarked,

 

“Today, Victoria, is the best day of my life.  You have made my life, and I will forever be grateful for your services.”

 

North America Immigration Law Group (Chen Immigration Law Associates) is a U.S. immigration law firm dedicated to representing corporations, research institutions, and individuals from all 50 U.S. states regarding I-140 immigration petitions. We specialize in employment-based immigration petition and have a proven record of high success rate for the categories of: EB2-NIW (National Interest Waiver), EB1-A (Alien of Extraordinary Ability), EB1-B (Outstanding Researcher/Professor) and O-1 (Alien of Extraordinary Ability).

Our Ten Thousand I-140 Approvals Provide Unprecedented Insight into the USCIS Adjudication Trend

With more than 16,000 EB-1A, EB-1B, EB-2 NIW and O-1 cases approved, we have first hand information on the manner in which the USCIS adjudicate I-140 cases. As the USCIS has constantly changed its adjudication standards for the EB-1A, EB-1B and EB-2 NIW categories, our firm's huge database of successful cases gives you unprecedented insight to USCIS adjudication trends. We carefully analyze the data for all of our cases and apply the results of our analyses toward giving our clients up-to-date advice and adapting our strategies such that we remain on par with the ever-shifting landscape of immigration law in the U.S. With us, you will always have access to important updates, strategies, and information so that you can make the most informed decisions about your case.

We Have Helped Hundreds and Thousands of Clients with Credentials and Backgrounds Similar to Yours

With our exceedingly large number of successful petitions, no matter what credentials you have, no matter your background and field of expertise, no matter your visa status or nationality, chances are we have helped hundreds or even thousands of clients just like you. Our clients are usually impressed with how well we understand their research and work. Our insight and understanding stems from the fact that we have handled many cases with elements similar to yours already, and this helps us devise the best strategies for each individual petition.

Vast Majority of Clients Came to Us Because of Referrals

For years, our firm has attracted new clients based solely on word of mouth, recommendations, and the positive collaboration experiences shared with them by their friends and family. We take pride in our reputation and work hard to ensure that we provide a green card application experience that our clients are happy to share with their friends and colleagues. That is how our approved cases grew from 600 in 2013 to over 3,500 in 2019.

---

To see more clients’ testimonials and approvals, please refer to:

Client's Testimonials

Approval Notices

To Learn More About Your Options CLICK HERE

---

Copyright © North America Immigration Law Group – WeGreened.com, All Rights Reserved.